freddabbot

Concepts of God

Posted on: April 2, 2011

the1611 concept

By Alfred D Smith 16/04/2011

From the beginning of time man has been endeavouring to define God and that, in relation to his own statue: vain man has always wanted to explain God in such a way that his carnal, limited, corrupt mind can somehow measure him and therefore fathom God’s immeasurable, incomprehensible personage and characteristics.

In her pivotal encounter with the wily old serpent the devil in the garden of Eden, Eve stated, casually paraphrasing that which God had actually said as so many with a bit of education tend to do today, that were they to eat of the fruit of the tree in the middle of the garden or so much as touch it that they were promised sure death by God. It all started with the question to the bride, back then Eve: today the church. What was definitely promised and apparently ignored, the eloquence of innocence or ignorance parading in the robe of knowledge, was that death would come to them that same day as a result of eating the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

If death did not visit them that same day then God, who deals in perfect justice, perfect truth and never mixes words would have been setting a serious legal, moral and credibility precedent that the enemies of truth and righteousness would have pounced upon with the ferocity of a hungry Bajan on a bowl of pudding and souse and a large ice cold glass of mauby.

Never a whisper came from the lurking detractors because they know that God has kept every single promise he made to the letter and within the boundary of the spirit. But some of you are saying they did not die that same said day. As a matter of fact Adam lived to be 930 years and begat sons and daughters according as it is written.

Because man only has the ability to see that which is physical, tangible if I can use that word, much of what is happening around us actually goes unnoticed, we remain unaware of the all the activities of the unseen world going on beyond human view. This however is seen by the principalities and powers that, invisible to Adam’s cursed offspring; do exist in the spirit world, which incidentally is the real world concealed from the natural eyes.

But why is it that man cannot see, is not conscious of this world? If this world is such a positive reality why is it that mankind who will occasionally confess to ‘feeling’ things in his spirit not have the ability to see them?

The reason is that the day that Adam ate of that forbidden fruit his spirit died immediately as God explicitly promised that he would and all his descendants henceforth came into this world spiritually handicapped, deaf, blind, dumb, dead spiritually. So in effect we were born lugging along through time with a dead spirit. Adam lost the ability to see any other world but Satan’s vain, sin cursed, condemned one and we, Adams direct descendants inherited this fallen state by virtue of being his natural offspring. Satan wants this state of affairs to remain a secret, a mystery to as many of us as he can keep blind because it works in his diabolical favour but if we walk by faith in the eternal unchangeable word of God it will work in our favour.

You might of course want to counter my bold unpopular statement by proposing that even if man’s spirit died on that day his soul did not but consider this. Death, in its true form is a separation. Two entities aligned with each other become disconnected. The body, for all intent and purpose, without the spirit, that is the breath of life, is dead even though its existence still continues and by that same principal the soul without Christ and infected by Adam’s inherited sin is also dead. Man’s soul, therefore, also died on the day that Adam ate of the forbidden fruit and the separation from God was so utterly terrifying that he ran and hid himself in the garden, that same place which before had been such a place of peace, instantly becoming conscious of his embarrassing, dreadful nakedness, hitherto unknown.

So now we come around to the body of man because physically man lived on for over 9 centuries. So that then gives council for the accuser an apparently sound case. Sound, that is, until we see the bloody skins of those slain animals in the hands of God being sewed together in order to cover the nakedness and the sin of Adam and eve. So there was also physical death in the garden that day, only it was a legal substitution on the grounds that the lamb of God, God’s only begotten son, slain from the foundation of the world had taken the place of the guilty as long as they agreed to the ‘bloody contract,’ and history shows that they did.

The 1611 concept of God is that he has never broken a promise. I unreservedly promote and adhere to this concept.

When Thomas Nelson, the unseen forces behind the lochman foundation, the International Bible society and the many other shadowy organisations decided that there was need for them to rewrite the bible in order for unspiritual, unregenerate man to understand it they had to negate a number of principals. 1st is Matthew 24 verse 35: Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. 2nd is Matthew 5 verse 18: For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. 3rd that God has promised explicitly to preserve his word Psalm 12 verse 6 & 7: The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD; thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.

They were so conscious and against this powerful promise that in all of their perversions they have changed this important portion of God’s word in their perversions to say that God will protect poor people instead of his word. I am not sure if they are suggesting that God is keeping people poor and protecting them or if he is protecting them from getting out of their poverty but that is what these fools have tampered with. 4th and most frightening thing they ignore is the promise that if any man add to God’s word that plagues in the word of God will be attached to those persons and if anyone is evil enough, for it takes an evil person to do this, to take away from the word of God his part will be taking out of the book of life. The exact words are…

“Revelation 22 verses 18-20 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. He which testifieth these things saith, surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.”

So God’s promise to protect his word in its entirety, for all eternity, from the tampering of the enemies is the foundational part of the 1611 concept of the bible.

In the 1611 concept there is no ‘twilight zone’ when it comes to salvation. One is either saved and a child of God or lost and a child of the devil, full stop. These filthy dreamers that presented the unsuspecting world with the 1881 revised version have decided that a conversionary period was needful in order to protect God from frauds like themselves and what did they do. They made salvation a drawn out process: 1st Corinthians: 1 verse 18 in the perversions states: for the ‘message’ of the cross is to them that are ‘perishing’ foolishness but to us that are ‘being saved’ it is the power of God. So what happens if you are hit by a bus while you are in this process of being saved? Then you would end up perishing I suppose. This 1811 concept sets salvation up as a reward for faithfulness, allegiance, worship and such like. In effect people are kept so busy ‘being saved’ that they have no time or inclination to carry out the great commission which commands us to go out into all the world and preach the gospel of Christ which is the power of God unto salvation to everyone that believes.

The 1611 concept of salvation is that it is a gift of God wholly dependant on the finished work of the Lord Jesus Christ and necessitated by our inability to please God in any way without faith in his every word not even by our most righteous work. Ephesians 2 verses 8, 9 & 10: For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.

The 1881 concept is that man and the world is the centre of Gods universe with God in heaven craving man’s adoration and worship.

The 1611 concept is that God is the centre, of our universe, pre-eminent the only potentate, and we are humbled and amazed that he would even take a second glance at us far less take an active part in our vain affairs, and because he humbled himself, stooped way down in order to consider us we can say like John in his epistle, we love him because he first loved us. Psalm 8 verses 3 & 4: When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained; what is man, that thou art mindful of him? And the son of man, that thou visitest him?

Historically, the most brilliant religious scholars of this world have always without exception been wrong when it came to things spiritual. The reason why these worldly wise scholars have always been so consistently unable to get it right is because the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. 1st Corinthians 1 verse 20: Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this world? Hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?

Some might want to put forth the argument that the wise men that came seeking Jesus at his birth, they at least got it right. Howbeit if they had gotten it right thousands of young children that were slaughtered by the soldiers of Herod would have been spared, Matthew 2 verse 18 In Rama was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children, and would not be comforted, because they are not. These wise men would have gone, like those unlearned shepherds straight to the inn in Bethlehem. Instead rather than follow the star all the way they followed their intellect at a critical part of their expedition and ended up miles off course, same as the scholars have been doing from the beginning of time even to this day. These unimpressive, unassuming shepherds on the other hand just left their sheep to the care of God and followed the heavenly instructions received from the angels and found their way to the son of God without incident or diversion.

Follow the simple instruction given in the solid word of God and one cannot go wrong is another principal of the 1611 concept.

Now just in case some of you are of the opinion that position in life, wealth or pedigree had any impact on this concept in the past take a just below the surface look at this passage in Luke 3 verses1 &2: Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judaea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip tetrarch of Ituraea and of the region of Trachonitis, and Lysanias the tetrarch of Abilene, Annas and Caiaphas being the high priests, the word of God came unto John the son of Zacharias in the wilderness. What an indictment when we consider that the same situation prevails today.

The word of God has never had regard or respect for earthly rank, class, political, religious, or social standing. God’s man must be called and sent by the Holy Spirit in order for his work to have any impact upon this sin cursed world. The 1611 concept deals in principal not sentiment.

God has been so consistent through time that there definitely is no reason to believe that he will change at any time. He will continue to preserve his word, keep his promises, confound the wise, call the lost to eternal life, resist the proud and surprise us when we think we know all that there is to know.

Hellfire & brimstone preaching was one of the hall marks of the ministry of Christ while he travelled up and down the cities and villages of Palestine during his earthly ministry. The truth, however, has never been popular among Adams race historically and this aspect of the truth especially, has had to endure a great deal of disapproval, ridicule, and even denial within the scholarly community. God’s thoughts on justice are alien to the worlds way of thinking and hell is about justice.

But why would the average scholarly preacher find it so difficult to accept the reality of an eternal hell that will someday be cast with all of its devilish, evil, corrupt, abominable content into the eternal lake of fire where there will be weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth ?

Revelation 20 verse 10-15: And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever. And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

The reason, my dear friend this eternal concept of hell is not accepted is because the average student preacher, coming out of the average modern bible school, does not have or know anything about the 1611 concept of the word of God. They have it programmed into them that as a matter of course that there is no difference between the two diametrically opposed concepts. They are told over and over again until they accept it that that both came from the same manuscript and very few ever take the time to try to find out that they are being lied to by the subtle one. John 8 verse 43-45: Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

The first thing that happens to these young unsuspecting, enthusiastic boys and girls is that they are taken through a process of disarmament where they have the sword of the Lord, which is the Holy Spirit Inspired WORD OF GOD, exchange for one of the numerous copyrighted counterfeits coming off of the 1881Westcot and Hort Vatican funded perversions. Yes sirs they are systematically disarmed, neutered, castrated, begging your pardon for using these obscene terminologies.

I once had one of these preachers suggest to me that it is these highly educated scholars who are the most qualified to make judgements, decisions as regards to what is reliable and truthful in our book, not the author of the book the Holy Spirit or us ignorant uneducated men of God. Nevertheless, I beg to differ because I said it before and I will say it again and again till I am heard; historically those religious scholars have never been right. Jesus had no uses for them, neither did John the Baptist and neither do I.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


  • None
  • freddabbot: would these text more ancient than the received Greek text from which the king James version of the bible been translated be the Alexandrina text and
  • Jim Dandy: You wrote such a long piece, I've selected only one small paragraph, which is reproduced below: QUOTE: The 1611 authorized version of the bible is

Categories

%d bloggers like this: